English

The passage of the US-sanctioned Rich Starry and the approach of the Washington-targeted Murlikishan put the Ormuz Strait at the centre of a new credibility test. The U.S. system officially targets ships linked to Iranian ports, without fully closing transit to non-Iranian ports. This legal and military nuance already weighs on insurers, shipowners and energy markets in a corridor where a decisive share of world oil and LNG is still passing through.

In a speech broadcast Monday evening on Al Manar, Naïm Qassem rejected the meeting scheduled for Tuesday in Washington between the ambassadors of Lebanon and Israel. The Secretary-General of Hezbollah called on the Lebanese State to cancel these discussions, which he considered unnecessary as long as Israeli bombing continued. He also reaffirmed the continuation of the confrontation, called for the implementation of the November 2024 agreement and sent a direct message to President Joseph Aoun and the government.

On 13 April, the Israeli army launched a ground offensive on Bint Jbeil, a strategic bastion of Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. The assault, carried out after the complete encirclement of the city, took place on the eve of the Washington talks and was part of a regional war marked by a serious and persistent humanitarian crisis in Lebanon.

The United States embargo against Iranian maritime flows entered into force on Monday, 13 April, in the Ormuz area. Washington claims not to close the Strait to all world trade, but the effect is already visible: the tankers slow down, the Brent returns to over $100, the physical market flies away and China, the first customer of Iranian crude, finds itself directly exposed. The article details Washington's strategic logic, the risks of Iranian retaliation, the immediate impact on financial markets and why Beijing could be one of the major economic victims of this new stage.

The Lebanese Ministry of Public Health published on Monday 13 April a new cumulative assessment of the victims of Israeli bombings since 2 March. According to the Emergency Health Operations Centre, 2,089 people were killed and 6,762 injured. On 13 April alone, 34 people were killed and 174 injured. The information provided by the Ministry also details the impact of the conflict on the health sector, with ambulance workers, medical centres and hospitals affected.

The bombardment reported on 13 April against the archaeological citadel of Tyre is not an ordinary collateral damage. According to the Lebanese public agency, the strike hit a UNESCO World Heritage site, already documented as vulnerable and covered by a strengthened protection regime. The stake is twofold: heritage, because Tyre concentrates an essential part of Mediterranean and Lebanese history; legal, because historical monuments and protected cultural property fall within a specific framework of international humanitarian law and can, depending on the circumstances, place the issue of war crime at the forefront.

The interview between Youssef Rajji and Johann Wadephul marks more than a 45 million euro aid announcement. It enshrines a diplomatic repositioning that Beirut assumes more and more clearly: to deal with the Lebanese issue in an autonomous framework, distinct from the Iranian trajectory, while direct discussions with Israel must open up in Washington. This line remains fragile because Lebanon is seeking a ceasefire while Israel maintains a broader agenda and Lebanese internal divisions persist.

On the eve of the discussions planned in Washington between the Lebanese and Israeli representatives, the gap is complete. Beirut wanted to make the ceasefire the heart of the meeting and even its political prerequisite. On the contrary, Washington has validated a reading that leaves Lebanon out of the regional pause, while Israel continues its offensive in the South and keeps the capital under threat. The article goes back to this American dissociation, the contradiction between the Lebanese mandate and the Israeli agenda, and what this sequence says about Lebanese sovereignty under military pressure.

The latest update of the CNRS-L brutally places housing in the centre of the war in Lebanon. Between 2 March and 7 April 2026, 37,836 housing units were identified as destroyed or damaged. The number is massive, but its strength is mainly due to its rapid accumulation and geography: Baabda, Nabatiyeh, Bint Jbeil, Sour and Marjaayoun concentrate most of the damage. The 2023-2024 report remains essential to measure the scale of the shift, but the focus is now on this new sequence and what it announces for the recovery.

In less than one day, the Lebanese Red Cross was hit twice in southern Lebanon. First on the road to Beit Yahoun, where an Israeli drone killed the rescuer Hassan Badawi during a humanitarian mission. Then in Tyre, where a strike targeted a Red Cross centre during the transfer of an injured person. The stake goes beyond the immediate emotion: when medical teams, ambulances and identified rescue centres are attacked, the classification of war crime becomes a central legal hypothesis.

Trump Pope: After attacking Leo XIV, Donald Trump spreads an almost Christian image and revives the debate on the cult of the leader.

On 13 April 2026 not only refers to the memory of the bus of Ain al-Remmaneh and the beginning of the 1975 civil war. He refers to a very present risk: that of a Lebanon weakened by an Israeli offensive that not only destroys infrastructure and lives, but also revives the internal fractures of the country. Between massive displacements, pressure on the state, divisions around Hezbollah and fear of a confessional rereading of war, the country sees the reappearance of the mechanisms it believed contained.

In this text, Mohamed El Bachir describes Gaza as the heart of a global changeover, accuses Israel and its Western supporters, and sees in the confrontation with Iran and the Arab, Lebanese, Iraqi and Yemeni resistances the risk of a major regional war, or even of a lasting outbreak on the whole Middle East.

The transfer of Radio Orient to a holding company of the United Arab Emirates in 2025 seals the end of the Hariri media empire. Over thirty-two years of political, diplomatic and media influence between Beirut, Paris, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi, and the possible impact of this takeover on its future editorial line.