News

Official Lebanon seeks to prolong a fragile truce before entering into direct negotiations with Israel. Between American pressure, dependence on the Iranian-American case, continued destruction in the South and diplomatic activism in Paris, Riyadh, Doha and Washington, Beirut is trying to avoid an immediate relapse into the war on the ground.

In less than three days, the Lebanese front again gave the image of a gear. An Israeli strike in southern Lebanon, presented by the IDF as an action against Hezbollah fighters, fed the Lebanese side the trial of a truce already emptied of its substance. The next day, Hezbollah claimed rocket and drone fire into northern Israel. Then, on Wednesday at dawn, a bombardment on the Beqaa confirmed that the accalmia remained precarious, incomplete and suspended from a military balance that deteriorated hour after hour.

Donald Trump finally extended the cease-fire in Iran at a time when he was still hearing, a few hours earlier, that he did not want to extend the truce. This reversal avoids an immediate resumption of the bombings, but hardly settles anything on the substance. The United States embargo on Iranian ports remains in place, the Strait of Ormuz remains under high pressure, and discussions in Islamabad continue to face the nuclear issue, sanctions and deep mistrust between Washington and Tehran. The war retreats one step, without leaving its tipping zone.

By proposing a meeting between Joseph Aoun and Benjamin Netanyahu, Samir Geagea moved the debate far beyond the ceasefire. In Lebanon today, such a summit would not only be diplomatic. It could become a powerful factor in the internal divide between state, Hezbollah, partisan camps and public opinion.

In receiving the US Ambassador and then a delegation from the Sovereignty Front, Joseph Aoun set a clear political line for the post-threat. The President wants to preserve the cease-fire, launch a Lebanese-led bilateral negotiation under the leadership of Simon Karam, and make this process the framework for ending the war, the Israeli occupation of southern areas and the continued fragility of state authority in the South.

Israel once again spreads a map in Arabic and directly threatens the people of southern Lebanon by prohibiting them from returning to dozens of villages. Under cover of security, the Israeli army draws an inner red line, transforms the truce into a zone of restraint and politically locks the local civilian return.

On 20 April 2026, the Lebanese press described a Lebanon suspended from a fragile truce, with destruction in the South, state initiatives, Hezbollah pressure and crucial negotiations in Islamabad. Ormuz, Israel and Washington-Téhéran together shape the precarious balance that still holds the ceasefire in Lebanon today.

The cease-fire in Lebanon is increasingly devoid of its practical scope. Since the night of 20 April, the reported incidents have led to a continuation of Israeli violations, including the destruction of buildings in Chamaa, Naqurah and Bayyada, the attack on Tayri, a house targeted at Borj Qlaouiyah, the low-altitude drones over Tyre, Baalbek, Beirut and the southern suburbs, and the search for two bodies in Qasmiyeh. For the inhabitants, the truce still exists on paper, but it no longer creates a real civilian space.

The major risk for Lebanon is not only an increase in oil if the Ormuz crisis worsens. The main danger is the breakdown of the truce on the Lebanese front. The current ceasefire remains short, fragile and dependent on a regional balance between Washington, Tehran and Israel. If this balance breaks, South Lebanon could once again become a field of military pressure, with displaced people back in wait, a halted reconstruction and a Lebanese state still unable to control tempo alone.

Israel confirms that the soldier striking a statue of Jesus in southern Lebanon is one of his own, reviving the question of sanctions.

In the Gulf, the last few hours have turned an already fragile truce into a phase of acute tension. The reported shootings against merchant ships, the resumption of strict military control in Ormuz and, above all, the seizure of the Iranian cargo ship Touska by the United States weigh heavily on the diplomatic sequence. In Islamabad, Pakistani mediation is not officially dead, but now lacks a clear timetable, while Tehran refuses to validate a new meeting under pressure.

The yellow line imposed by Israel in southern Lebanon threatens UNIFIL's access to its area of operations and is difficult to achieve under resolution 1701. By limiting the freedom of movement of peacekeepers, it undermines the ceasefire, the return of civilians and Lebanese sovereignty.

In Bkerké, the Maronite Patriarch Bechara Rai gave his homily a clearly political reach. In front of delegations from the South, he denounced a war "imposed", rejected by both the population and the State, and recalled that no lasting peace can be built outside the State framework. His message links the end of the fighting, the return of the displaced, the reconstruction of sovereignty and the need for a negotiated settlement that leaves neither the South nor the State at the margin.